|
@@ -163,16 +163,17 @@ contact or proximity of an individual carrying the illness and a healthy
|
|
|
individual. This is possible due to the distinction between infected beings
|
|
|
who are carriers of the disease and the part of the population, which is
|
|
|
susceptible to infection. In the model, the mentioned groups are capable to
|
|
|
-change, e.g., healthy individuals becoming infected. In the real world the size
|
|
|
-of a population is subject to a number of factors that can contribute to change.
|
|
|
-The population is increased by the occurrence of births and decreased by the
|
|
|
-occurrence of deaths. There are different reasons for mortality, including the
|
|
|
-natural aging process or the development of other diseases. To omit this factor
|
|
|
-of complexity, the model assumes the size $N$ of the population remains constant
|
|
|
-throughout the duration of the epidemic. The population $N$ is comprised of
|
|
|
-three distinct groups: the \emph{susceptible} group $S$, the \emph{infectious}
|
|
|
-group $I$ and the \emph{removed} group $R$ (hence SIR model). For $S$, $I$, $R$
|
|
|
-and $N$ applies:
|
|
|
+change, e.g., healthy individuals becoming infected. The model assumes the
|
|
|
+size $N$ of the population remains constant throughout the duration of the
|
|
|
+pandemic. The population $N$ comprises three distinct groups: the
|
|
|
+\emph{susceptible} group $S$, the \emph{infectious} group $I$ and the
|
|
|
+\emph{removed} group $R$ (hence SIR model). Let $\mathcal{T} = [t_0, t_f]\subseteq
|
|
|
+ \mathbb{R}_{\geq0}$ be the time span of the pandemic, then,
|
|
|
+\begin{equation} \label{eq:N_char}
|
|
|
+ S: \mathcal{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{N}, \quad I: \mathcal{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{N}, \quad R: \mathcal{T}\rightarrow\mathbb{N},
|
|
|
+\end{equation}
|
|
|
+give the values of $S$, $I$ and $R$ at a certain point of time
|
|
|
+$t\in\mathcal{T}$. For $S$, $I$, $R$ and $N$ applies:
|
|
|
\begin{equation} \label{eq:N_char}
|
|
|
N = S + I + R.
|
|
|
\end{equation}
|
|
@@ -201,7 +202,7 @@ McKendrick~\cite{1927} propose the following set of differential equations:
|
|
|
\begin{split}
|
|
|
\frac{dS}{dt} &= -\beta S I,\\
|
|
|
\frac{dI}{dt} &= \beta S I - \alpha I,\\
|
|
|
- \frac{dR}{dt} &= \alpha I,
|
|
|
+ \frac{dR}{dt} &= \alpha I.
|
|
|
\end{split}
|
|
|
\end{equation}
|
|
|
This, according to Edelstein-Keshet, is based on the following assumption:
|
|
@@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ and May~\cite{Anderson1991} propose a modified model:
|
|
|
\end{split}
|
|
|
\end{equation}
|
|
|
In which $\beta SI$ gets normalized by $N$, which is more correct in a
|
|
|
-real world aspect.\\
|
|
|
+real world aspect~\cite{Anderson1991}.\\
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial phase of a pandemic is characterized by the infection of a small
|
|
|
number of individuals, while the majority of the population remains susceptible.
|
|
@@ -239,42 +240,56 @@ describes the initial configuration of a system in which a disease has just
|
|
|
emerged.\\
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{figure}[h]
|
|
|
- \centering
|
|
|
- \begin{subfigure}[h]{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
- \centering
|
|
|
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{reference_params_synth.png}
|
|
|
- \caption{Basic configuration, $\alpha=0.35$, $\beta=0.5$}
|
|
|
- \label{fig:synth_norm}
|
|
|
- \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
- \hfill
|
|
|
- \begin{subfigure}[h]{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
- \centering
|
|
|
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{high_beta_synth.png}
|
|
|
- \caption{High $\alpha$ configuration, $\alpha=0.45$, $\beta=0.5$}
|
|
|
- \label{fig:synth_high_beta}
|
|
|
- \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
- \hfill
|
|
|
- \begin{subfigure}[h]{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
- \centering
|
|
|
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{low_beta_synth.png}
|
|
|
- \caption{Low $\alpha$ configuration, $\alpha=0.25$, $\beta=0.5$}
|
|
|
- \label{fig:synth_low_beta}
|
|
|
- \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
- \hfill
|
|
|
- \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
- \centering
|
|
|
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{high_alpha_synth.png}
|
|
|
- \caption{High $\beta$ configuration, $\alpha=0.35$, $\beta=0.6$}
|
|
|
- \label{fig:synth_high_alpha}
|
|
|
- \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
- \begin{subfigure}[b]{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
- \centering
|
|
|
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{low_alpha_synth.png}
|
|
|
- \caption{Low $\beta$ configuration, $\alpha=0.35$, $\beta=0.3$}
|
|
|
- \label{fig:synth_low_alpha}
|
|
|
- \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
- \caption{Synthetic data, using~\Cref{eq:modSIR} and $N=7.9\cdot 10^6$,
|
|
|
- $I_0=10$ with different sets of parameters.}
|
|
|
+ %\centering
|
|
|
+ \setlength{\unitlength}{1cm} % Set the unit length for coordinates
|
|
|
+ \begin{picture}(12, 9.5) % Specify the size of the picture environment (width, height)
|
|
|
+ % reference
|
|
|
+ \put(0, 2.5){
|
|
|
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
+ \centering
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{reference_params_synth.png}
|
|
|
+ \caption{$\alpha=0.35$, $\beta=0.5$}
|
|
|
+ \label{fig:synth_norm}
|
|
|
+ \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ % 1. row, 1.image (low beta)
|
|
|
+ \put(5, 5){
|
|
|
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
+ \centering
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{low_beta_synth.png}
|
|
|
+ \caption{$\alpha=0.25$, $\beta=0.5$}
|
|
|
+ \label{fig:synth_low_beta}
|
|
|
+ \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ % 1. row, 2.image (high beta)
|
|
|
+ \put(9, 5){
|
|
|
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
+ \centering
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{high_beta_synth.png}
|
|
|
+ \caption{$\alpha=0.45$, $\beta=0.5$}
|
|
|
+ \label{fig:synth_high_beta}
|
|
|
+ \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ % 2. row, 1.image (low alpha)
|
|
|
+ \put(5, 0){
|
|
|
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
+ \centering
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{low_alpha_synth.png}
|
|
|
+ \caption{$\alpha=0.35$, $\beta=0.4$}
|
|
|
+ \label{fig:synth_low_alpha}
|
|
|
+ \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ % 2. row, 2.image (high alpha)
|
|
|
+ \put(9, 0){
|
|
|
+ \begin{subfigure}{0.3\textwidth}
|
|
|
+ \centering
|
|
|
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{high_alpha_synth.png}
|
|
|
+ \caption{$\alpha=0.35$, $\beta=0.6$}
|
|
|
+ \label{fig:synth_high_alpha}
|
|
|
+ \end{subfigure}
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
+ \end{picture}
|
|
|
+ \caption{Synthetic data, using~\Cref{eq:modSIR} and $N=7.9\cdot 10^6$, $I_0=10$ with different sets of parameters.}
|
|
|
\label{fig:synth_sir}
|
|
|
\end{figure}
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -293,7 +308,21 @@ When the number of infections exceeds the number of recoveries, the peak of $I$
|
|
|
will occur early and will be high. On the other hand, if recoveries occur at a
|
|
|
faster rate than new infections the peak will occur later and will be low. This
|
|
|
means, that it is crucial to know both $\beta$ and $\alpha$ to be able to
|
|
|
-quantize a pandemic using the SIR model.
|
|
|
+simulate a pandemic using the SIR model.\\
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The SIR model makes a number of assumptions that are intended to reduce the
|
|
|
+model's overall complexity while simultaneously increasing its divergence from
|
|
|
+actual reality. One such assumption is that the size of the population, $N$,
|
|
|
+remains constant. This depiction is not an accurate representation of the actual
|
|
|
+relations observed in the real world, as the size of a population is subject to
|
|
|
+a number of factors that can contribute to change. The population is increased
|
|
|
+by the occurrence of births and decreased by the occurrence of deaths. There are
|
|
|
+different reasons for mortality, including the natural aging process or the
|
|
|
+development of other diseases. Other examples are the absence of the possibility
|
|
|
+for individuals to be susceptible again, after having recovered, or the
|
|
|
+possibility for the transition rates to change due to new variants or the
|
|
|
+implementation of new countermeasures. We address this latter option in the
|
|
|
+next~\Cref{sec:pandemicModel:rsir}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
% -------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -377,6 +406,14 @@ systems, as we describe in~\Cref{sec:mlp}.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\section{Multilayer Perceptron}
|
|
|
\label{sec:mlp}
|
|
|
+In~\Cref{sec:differentialEq} we show the importance of differential equations to
|
|
|
+systems, being able to show the change of it dependent on a certain parameter of
|
|
|
+the parameter. In~\Cref{sec:epidemModel} we show specific applications for
|
|
|
+differential equations in an epidemiological context. Now, the last point is to
|
|
|
+solve these equations. For this problem, there are multiple methods to reach
|
|
|
+this goal one of them is the \emph{Multilayer Perceptron}
|
|
|
+(MLP)~\cite{Hornik1989}. In the following we briefly tackle the structure,
|
|
|
+training and usage of these neural networks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
% -------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|